They are blamed on Brotherhood
2020年8月17日They are blamed on Brotherhood favourites who were allowed to build illegally on prime agricultural land. Its assets were seized.Hundreds of Brotherhood activists were killed when Mr Morsi was toppled; thousands more are languishing in jail. He promised with Nehru, Tito and Sukarno to banish Cold War hostility and usher https://www.seasonsgazebo.com/product/portable-garden-gazebo/ in global peace and harmony.One recalls wistfully that Egypt’s second President, Gamal Abdel Nasser, was regarded as the apostle of revolution.
Those who welcomed Mr Mubarak’s fall when the so-called Arab Spring gave short shrift to dictators were hoist with their own petard in the subsequent election: instead of voting for a safe and secular retired Air Force chief as President, Egyptians chose Mr Morsi, the burly, bearded chairman of the Freedom and Justice Party which the Muslim Brotherhood had launched to contest the election. First, democracy is a double-edged weapon.Even if the commitment was seriously meant, it did not inspire confidence among people who see nominees of religious lobbies as prisoners of their rigorous masters. The prime and never-to-be-forgotten lesson of that conflagration is that those who uphold the lofty principle of "Vox Populi, Vox Dei" — the voice of the people is the voice of God — forget, as someone once pointed out, that the riotousness of the masses is always very close to madness. The FJP’s newspaper was closed and its equipment confiscated.
The violence continued until the Army Chief, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, seized power, bringing to a bitter and bloody end Egypt’s only experiment with democracy.Five years later, it captured 20 per cent of the seats, prompting a worried Mr Mubarak, who was then President, to rewrite the Constitution stipulating that: "political activity or political parties shall not be based on any religious background or foundation". Since Egypt was then virtually a British protectorate, the Brotherhood also aimed at loosening colonial control and purging Western influence.When he was released from confinement last week, 88-year-old Hosni Mubarak, who ruled Egypt with an iron hand for 30 years, slipped out of history into luxurious obscurity. Second, religion is a ruthless tiger that politicians mount at their own peril but cannot dismount at their own pleasure.
Those who welcomed Mr Mubarak’s fall when the so-called Arab Spring gave short shrift to dictators were hoist with their own petard in the subsequent election: instead of voting for a safe and secular retired Air Force chief as President, Egyptians chose Mr Morsi, the burly, bearded chairman of the Freedom and Justice Party which the Muslim Brotherhood had launched to contest the election. First, democracy is a double-edged weapon.Even if the commitment was seriously meant, it did not inspire confidence among people who see nominees of religious lobbies as prisoners of their rigorous masters. The prime and never-to-be-forgotten lesson of that conflagration is that those who uphold the lofty principle of "Vox Populi, Vox Dei" — the voice of the people is the voice of God — forget, as someone once pointed out, that the riotousness of the masses is always very close to madness. The FJP’s newspaper was closed and its equipment confiscated.
The violence continued until the Army Chief, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, seized power, bringing to a bitter and bloody end Egypt’s only experiment with democracy.Five years later, it captured 20 per cent of the seats, prompting a worried Mr Mubarak, who was then President, to rewrite the Constitution stipulating that: "political activity or political parties shall not be based on any religious background or foundation". Since Egypt was then virtually a British protectorate, the Brotherhood also aimed at loosening colonial control and purging Western influence.When he was released from confinement last week, 88-year-old Hosni Mubarak, who ruled Egypt with an iron hand for 30 years, slipped out of history into luxurious obscurity. Second, religion is a ruthless tiger that politicians mount at their own peril but cannot dismount at their own pleasure.
コメント